Referenties

• Adler, P. (1975). The transitional experience: An alternative view of culture shock. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 15, pp. 13-23.

• Andersen, P.A. (1999). Cultural Clues. California: Mountain View.

• Atkin, C. (1973). Instrumental Utilities and Information Seeking. In P. Clarke (Red.), New Models for Mass Communication Research (pp. 205-221) California: Sage Publications.

• Austin, C.N. (1986). Cross-cultural Re-entry: A Book of Readings. USA: ACU Press.

• Bennett, J.M.  (1977).  Transition Shock: Putting Culture Shock in Perspective. International and intercultural communication Annual Vol 4, pp. 215-222.

• Berelson, B. (1949). What “Missing the Newspaper” Means. In P.F. Lazarsfeld & F.N. Stanton (reds.), Communications Research (pp. 111-129). USA: Harper & Brothers.

• Berry J.W.  (1998). Intercultural Relations. Howe Island : Cross-Cultural/Multicultural Associates inc.

• Bird, S.E. (2003). The Audience in Everyday Life: Living in a Media World. New York: Routledge.

• Bosman, J. & Renckstorf, K. (1996). Information needs: problems, interests and consumption. In K. Renckstorf, D. McQuail & N. Jankowski (Reds.), Media Use as Social Action: A European Approach to Audience Studies (pp. 42-52). UK: John Libbey & Company.

• Brabant, S, Palmer, C.E., & Gramling, R. (1990). Returning Home: An Empirical Investigation of Cross-Cultural Reentry. International Journal for Intercultural Relations, 14, pp. 387-404.

• Brislin, R.W. (1981). Cross-Cultural Encounters: Face to Face Interaction. USA: Pergamon Press.

• Brislin, R.W. & Van Buren H. (1979). Can They Go Home Again? In C.N., Austin (red.) Cross-cultural Re-entry: A Book of Readings. USA: ACU Press. pp. 219-230.

• Burgoon, J.K. & Walther, J.B. (1990). Nonverbal Expectancies and the Evaluative Consequences of Violations. Human Communication research, 17, p. 232-265.

• Cushner, K & Brislin, R.W. (1996). Intercultural Interactions: A Practical Guide. USA: Sage Publications.

• Damen, L. (1987). Culture Learning: The Fifth Dimension in the Language Classroom. Massuchet: Addison-Wesley Publishing Inc.

• Dervin, B. (1989). Audience    as Listener and Learner, teacher and Confidante: The Sense-Making Approach. In R., Rice & C.K., Atkin (reds.). Public Communication Campaigns (pp. 67-86) Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

• D’Haenens, L., van Summeren C., Klokhuis, M; & Beentjes, J.W.J. (2004). Ownership and use of ‘old’ and ‘new’ media among ethnic minority youth in The Netherlands. The role of the ethno-cultural position. In K. Renckstorf, D. McQuail, J. Rosenbaum & G. Schaap (Reds.), Action Theory and Communication Research (pp. 315-344). Berlijn: De Gruyter.

• D’Hoest, A. (1997). Voor etnografie: Inleiding tot etnografie als communicatiewetenschappelijke onderzoeksmethode. Communicatie: Tijdschrift voor Communicatiewetenschap en Mediacultuur, 26 (3), pp. 2-19.

• Donohew, L. & Tipton, L. (1973). A Conceptual Model of Information Seeking,  Avoiding, and Processing. In P. Clarke (Red.), New Models for Mass Communication Research (pp. 242-263) California: Sage Publications.

• Gerbner, G. (1999). The Stories We Tell. Peace Review, 11(1), pp. 9-17 [19.08.2005, http://search.epnet.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&an=1801193&scope=site]

• Gielen, S. (2002). Adoptiekinderen en het cultivatie-effect [Licentiaatsthesis]. Leuven: KULeuven.

• Gudykunst, W.J. (1998). Applying Anxiety / Uncertainty Management (AUM) Theory to Intercultural Adjustment Training. International Journal for Intercultural Relations, 22, pp. 227-250.

• Gudykunst, W.J. & Ting-Toomey, S. (1988). Culture and Interpersonal Communication. Newbury Park: Sage.

• Gullahorn, J.T. & Gullahorn, M.J.  (1963). An extension of the U-curve hypothesis. Journal of Social Issues, 14, pp. 33-47.

• Hall, S. (1992). The Question of Cultural identity. In S. Hall, D. Held & T. McGrew (reds.). Modernity and its Futures (pp. 274-278). Cambridge: Polity Press.

• Hijmans, E. (2003). Het Dynamisch identiteitsmodel, een synthese van benaderingen. In I., Hak & F. Wester (reds.) Kwalitatief onderzoek: de praktijk: Waarneming, analyse en reflectie. Boekaflevering KWALON, 8 (2), pp. 114-126. Amsterdam: SISWO.

• Hoopes, D.S. & Push, M. D. (1979). Multicultural Education: A Cross Cultural Training Approach. USA: Intercultural Network.

• Jandt, F.E. (2004). An Introduction to Intercultural Communication: Identities in a Global Community. Londen: Sage Publications.

• Katz, E., Blumler, J.G. & Gurevitch, M. (1974). Utilization of Mass Communication by the Individual. In J.G. Blumler & E. Katz (Reds.), The Uses of Mass Communications: Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research (pp. 19-34). USA: Sage Publications.

• Kim, Y. Y. (2001). Becoming Intercultural. USA: Sage Publications.

• Korhonen, K (1996-1997). Intercultural Communication through Hypermedia [licentiaatsthesis]. Finland: University of Jyväskylä.

• La Brack, B. (1993) The Missing Linkage: The Process of Integrating Orientation and Reentry. In Paige, M. (Red.) Education for The Intercultural Experience, pp. 245-258. USA: Intercultural Press.

• Martin, J.N. (1984). The Intercultural Reentry: Conceptualization and Directions for Future Research. International Journal for Intercultural Relations, 8, pp. 115-134.

• Martin, J.N. (1986). Communication in the Intercultural Reentry: Student Sojourners’ Perceptions of  Change in Reentry Relationships. International Journal for Intercultural Relations, 10, pp. 1-22.

• Martin, J.N. (1993). The intercultural reentry of student sojourners: recent contributions to theory, research, and training. In Paige, M (Red.) Education for the Intercultural Experience. USA: Intercultural Press.

• Martin, J.N. & Harrell T.A. (1996). Reentry Training for Intercultural Sojourners. In  Landis, D. & Bhagat R.S. (Reds.), Handbook of Intercultural Training. USA: Intercultural Press.

• McQuail, D. (1997). Audience analysis. Londen: Sage Publications.

• Moschis, G.P. (1980). Consumer Information Use: Individual versus Social Predictors. Communication Research, 7(2), pp. 139-160.

• Paige, R.M. (1993). On the Nature of Intercultural Experiences and intercultural education. In Paige, R.M. (Red.), Education for the intercultural experience (p. 1-3)

• Palmgreen, P. & Rayburn II, J.D. (1985). An Expectancy-Value Approach to Media Gratofications. In K.E. Rosengren, L.A. Wenner & P. Palmgreen (Reds.), Media Gratifications Research: Current Perspectives  (pp. 61-72). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications

• Palmgreen, P., Wenner, L.A. & Rosengren, K.E. (1985). Uses and Gratifications Research: The Past Ten Years. In K.E. Rosengren, L.A. Wenner & P. Palmgreen (Reds.), Media Gratifications Research: Current Perspectives  (pp. 11-40). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

• Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling Alone: the collapse and revival of the American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.

• Renckstorf, K. (1994). Mediagebruik als sociaal handelen: een handelingstheoretische benadering voor communicatiewetenschappelijk onderzoek. Nijmegen: ITS Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen.

• Renckstorf, K. (1996). Media use as a social action: a theoretical perspective. In K. Renckstorf, D. McQuail, N. Jankowski (Reds.), Media Use as Social Action: A European Approach to Audience Studies (pp. 18-31). UK: John Libbey & Company.

• Renckstorf, K. & Wester, F. (2004). The ‘media use as social action’ approach: theory, methodology and research evidence so far. In K. Renckstorf, D. McQuail, J. Rosenbaum & G. Schaap (Reds.), Action Theory and Communication Research (pp. 51-84). Berlijn: De Gruyter.

• Robinson, G.L.N. (1988). Crosscultural Understanding. UK: Prentice Hall International.

• Rohrlich, B.F. & Martin, J.N. (1991). Host Country and Reentry Adjustment of Student Sojourners. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 15, pp. 163-182.

• Rosengren, H.E. (1974). Uses & Gratifications: A paradigm outlined. In J.G. Blumler & E. Katz (Reds.), The Uses of Mass Communications: Current erspectives on Gratifications research (pp. 269-286).

• Rubin, A.M. (1994). Media Uses and Effects: A Uses-and-Gratificatins Perspective. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (reds.). Media Effects: advances in theory and research (pp. 417-436). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associations.

• Samovar, L.A. , Porter, R.E., & Stefani, L.A. (1998). Communication Between Cultures. USA: Wadsworth.

• Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. California: Sage Publications.

• University of Southern California. Currently abroad? USA: University of Southern California. [25.11.2004, Office of Overseas Studies: http://www.usc.edu/dept/LAS/overseas/faq/culture_shock]

• University of California, Irvine. Cultural Adjustment. (2000) USA: University of California, Irvine. [25.11.2004, Center for International Education: http://www.cie.uci.edu/world/shock.html]

• University of Minnesota. The reality of Reverse Culture Shock. (2003) USA: University of Minnesota. [25.11.2004, Learning Abroad Center: http://www.umabroad.umn.edu/alumni/reverseCultureShock.html)

• Van Bouwel, K. (2004). Het individu voorbij, de mens in zijn sociale context [Licentiaatsthesis]. Leuven: KULeuven.

• Van Den Bulck, J. (2000). Communicatiewetenschap. Leuven: Acco.

• Van der Goot, M., Beentjes, J.W.J. & van Selm, M. (2004). Elderly people’s media use in context of personal meaning. In K. Renckstorf, D. McQuail, J. Rosenbaum & G. Schaap (Reds.), Action Theory and Communication Research (pp. 163-176). Berlijn: De Gruyter.

• Ward, C (1996) Acculturation. In Landis, D. & Bhagat R.S. (Reds.),  Handbook of Intercultural Training. USA: Sage Publications.

• Ward, C (1998). The U-curve Trial: A Longitudinal Stduy of Psychological and sociocultural Transition. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22 (3), pp. 227-291.

• Ward, C. , Bochner, S. & Furnham, A. (2001). The Psychology of Culture Shock. USA: Routledge.

• Werkman, S.L. (1986). Coming Home: Adjustment of Americans to the United States after Living Abroad. In Austin, C.N. (red.) , Cross-Cultural re-entry:  A Book of Readings. USA: ACU Press